One of the things to consider as a teacher is how isolating the career can be. As someone responsible for 100 students and their individual well being, it can be easy to fall into the trap of allowing the job to consume all of your available time to effectively respond to their needs.
The better a teacher you become, the more you realise you can do. The more pressure there is to perform.
Focusing on one class leads to deficits in other classes. These deficits are then questioned and you start to doubt your ability and there starts a downward spiral difficult to arrest on your own.
Then there are personal considerations when faced with students that relate directly to your life story. The child that is facing issues that you faced as a child and believe you can make a difference to their lives. A laptop computer given on loan, buying a student text, giving a few minutes extra tuition, making sure they have enough money for an excursion, advocating for a student - I know teachers regularly do these things. Knowing that it would be difficult to enjoy your weekend and satisfy your conscience if you didn't act when you had the opportunity.
Another trap is allowing a deficit of time to let you lose your support network. Being consumed by teaching can lead to a one dimensional person, having only one interest and thus having limited interest to others. This can make it a lonely profession especially when the majority of conversation you have is with minors.
It doesn't just affect you, it affects those around you. Supporting a teacher is a full time occupation. You come home tired and spent. Events of the day can overwhelm you. It can be a real pressure cooker at times, especially around TEE and reports or when the playground is on fire.
Somebody told me about the monkey analogy and how if someone passed you the monkey - it was important to pass the monkey to another (yes it was an admin person). As a metaphor for problems I think as a teacher, the tribe of monkeys needs a support network capable of dealing with them. Admin sometimes needs to remember this.
Maybe I'm a bit old fashioned. Maybe I have to look at it a bit more like a job and less like an opportunity to make a difference. I wonder if I would be able to do it anymore if I thought about it that way.
It's no wonder many teachers are a little bit more than strange.
A bigger worry is that you fail to notice it after a while :-)
Saturday, March 12, 2011
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Good Day
After the issues with the 2C test it was nice to have a good day. My 10's were responsive and worked well whilst our Principal was in the room for a whole hour doing his impromptu visits. It's good that he does them, but it can be a bit harrowing. We investigated how to use our CAS calculators to build spreadsheets and will now start looking at the results to investigate compound interest further.
There were lots of things I would do differently with the lesson itself but I can't fault the kids in that they followed instruction, were able to use formulas and solve a compound interest problem using technology by the end of the lesson. After replacing most of the batteries in the morning, only two failed during the lesson which was ok.
I checked my 9's homework and that was a different story. I used some old fashioned "I will do my homework when my teacher asks me to otherwise I will have to write this." x 100 to ensure that students had some encouragement to do their homework in future. Those that did their homework enjoyed it if nothing else.
My 1B's are going ok, they finished the exercise but are not fully understanding cumulative frequency, so we will need to redo that lesson. I must remember tomorrow morning to hunt out a worksheet that will reinforce the connection between cf and median (and xf and mean).
A nice change from Friday.
Russ.
There were lots of things I would do differently with the lesson itself but I can't fault the kids in that they followed instruction, were able to use formulas and solve a compound interest problem using technology by the end of the lesson. After replacing most of the batteries in the morning, only two failed during the lesson which was ok.
I checked my 9's homework and that was a different story. I used some old fashioned "I will do my homework when my teacher asks me to otherwise I will have to write this." x 100 to ensure that students had some encouragement to do their homework in future. Those that did their homework enjoyed it if nothing else.
My 1B's are going ok, they finished the exercise but are not fully understanding cumulative frequency, so we will need to redo that lesson. I must remember tomorrow morning to hunt out a worksheet that will reinforce the connection between cf and median (and xf and mean).
A nice change from Friday.
Russ.
Labels:
daily reflection
Friday, March 4, 2011
Making mistakes
You know.. it would be nice to not make mistakes. It's even better when your mistakes aren't distributed to multiple schools for scrutiny. I had the wonderful opportunity of writing three assessments for moderation groups all at the same time, two tests (one for 3A MAT and one for 2C MAT) and an EPW (for 2C). Tests did not exist that could be pulled off the shelf and I didn't want to use a Curriculum Council EPW as they have been widely leaked (yes I'm looking at you Curtin University!).
Anyhow, the 2C paper had an error (three circle Venn diagrams aren't part of the curriculum) and it was one of my complex questions along with another question that I changed at a teacher request to set notation. Unfortunately by doing so it also reduced them to non complex questions. The test (although broadly covering key concepts) did not have the required complexity.
Once marked the curve for my class was badly skewed. It's a bit embarrassing as it's the first time I've taught 2C and really wanted to do the right thing by my moderation group. The test had an error in it and I had to re-issue the marking key as well as the original one had mistakes in it too.
Hopefully the 3A paper is ok (it's harder than the 2C paper and I think my students are going to get a little wake up call) and I must say - the amount of work required to write a 2C EPW should not be underestimated. If you're interested in an original 2C Finance EPW based on spreadsheets leave a comment with your DET email address and I'll forward it to you (Your email address is safe, - I moderate all comments before release and I'll delete the comment before it goes online so that the email address is not made public).
I've been flat out trying to get it all done (and interim reports) and bed down my classes. Hopefully now it will settle as all of my NCOS assessments for term one have been done and I can start enjoying myself again working on the lower school courses. Ten year 9/10 students approached me today to run an afterschool extension class again. They're fun but a lot of work when you and the kids are hot and tired.
We'll see how it goes. Bring on the long weekend!
Anyhow, the 2C paper had an error (three circle Venn diagrams aren't part of the curriculum) and it was one of my complex questions along with another question that I changed at a teacher request to set notation. Unfortunately by doing so it also reduced them to non complex questions. The test (although broadly covering key concepts) did not have the required complexity.
Once marked the curve for my class was badly skewed. It's a bit embarrassing as it's the first time I've taught 2C and really wanted to do the right thing by my moderation group. The test had an error in it and I had to re-issue the marking key as well as the original one had mistakes in it too.
Hopefully the 3A paper is ok (it's harder than the 2C paper and I think my students are going to get a little wake up call) and I must say - the amount of work required to write a 2C EPW should not be underestimated. If you're interested in an original 2C Finance EPW based on spreadsheets leave a comment with your DET email address and I'll forward it to you (Your email address is safe, - I moderate all comments before release and I'll delete the comment before it goes online so that the email address is not made public).
I've been flat out trying to get it all done (and interim reports) and bed down my classes. Hopefully now it will settle as all of my NCOS assessments for term one have been done and I can start enjoying myself again working on the lower school courses. Ten year 9/10 students approached me today to run an afterschool extension class again. They're fun but a lot of work when you and the kids are hot and tired.
We'll see how it goes. Bring on the long weekend!
Labels:
teaching
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Solving Venn diagrams where the intersection is unknown
n=40
Today in 2C MAT we came across that old chestnut, the Venn diagram with the missing value in the intersection with a number in A, B and the outside region.
In many cases the easiest way is to use a guess and check approach and a lot of the time the answer will fall out by substituting into the intersection and revising your result based on the values
A union B + the outside region = n.
n=40
Another approach is to name the segments and solve a series of equations:
a = 20-b
c = 30-b
a + b + c + 5 = 40
By substitution (20-b) + b + (30 - b) + 5 = 40
Therefore b=15
Once the intersection(b) is known, finding "A only"(a) and "B only"(b) is trivial.
I was asked the question "why teach this technique?" and my response was that it was not formally taught, it was a logical answer for a question given. We have some unknowns, we have some equations, why not solve for them? This sort of problem solving "setting up of equations" technique is common in optimisation and linear programming - why not use it in a probability setting?
I remember a particular student that was renowned for having solutions of this nature where his answers always deviated from the answer key and he had the right answer (or was on the right track) more often than not. We still call intuitive answers like this after "that" student as they forced the marker to find the underlying logic rather than application of a given method (if that student is reading this - get offline and study for your uni courses, scallywag!)
Anyhow, a third and more common approach is to rearrange the property:
A U B = A + B - A intersection B
By rearranging the equation
A intersection B = A + B - AUB
Since we know that:
AUB = U - (the outside region)
to find AUB is fairly simple:
AUB = 40-5
= 35
Therefore:
A intersection B = 20 + 30 - 35
= 15 (as before)
This approach does have the advantage that you can talk about the intersection being counted twice when the union is calculated by adding A + B where A and B aren't mutually exclusive.
I can't really see how this problem could be classed complex given the second method exists. Perhaps, if combined with a wordy explanation, a question of this sort could be made complex but to my mind that would defeat the purpose of the syllabus points in defining complexity. After all, why should something be classed a "complex question" if the only reason was that the question was worded to be understood by students with strong English comprehension?
Today in 2C MAT we came across that old chestnut, the Venn diagram with the missing value in the intersection with a number in A, B and the outside region.
In many cases the easiest way is to use a guess and check approach and a lot of the time the answer will fall out by substituting into the intersection and revising your result based on the values
A union B + the outside region = n.
n=40
Another approach is to name the segments and solve a series of equations:
a = 20-b
c = 30-b
a + b + c + 5 = 40
By substitution (20-b) + b + (30 - b) + 5 = 40
Therefore b=15
Once the intersection(b) is known, finding "A only"(a) and "B only"(b) is trivial.
I was asked the question "why teach this technique?" and my response was that it was not formally taught, it was a logical answer for a question given. We have some unknowns, we have some equations, why not solve for them? This sort of problem solving "setting up of equations" technique is common in optimisation and linear programming - why not use it in a probability setting?
I remember a particular student that was renowned for having solutions of this nature where his answers always deviated from the answer key and he had the right answer (or was on the right track) more often than not. We still call intuitive answers like this after "that" student as they forced the marker to find the underlying logic rather than application of a given method (if that student is reading this - get offline and study for your uni courses, scallywag!)
Anyhow, a third and more common approach is to rearrange the property:
A U B = A + B - A intersection B
By rearranging the equation
A intersection B = A + B - AUB
Since we know that:
AUB = U - (the outside region)
to find AUB is fairly simple:
AUB = 40-5
= 35
Therefore:
A intersection B = 20 + 30 - 35
= 15 (as before)
This approach does have the advantage that you can talk about the intersection being counted twice when the union is calculated by adding A + B where A and B aren't mutually exclusive.
I can't really see how this problem could be classed complex given the second method exists. Perhaps, if combined with a wordy explanation, a question of this sort could be made complex but to my mind that would defeat the purpose of the syllabus points in defining complexity. After all, why should something be classed a "complex question" if the only reason was that the question was worded to be understood by students with strong English comprehension?
Labels:
teaching
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)