Self sabotaging is something I've watched a lot in education, it can be devastating to a career. Self sabotaging is doing things that will inhibit your progression as a teacher or administrator. One of the self sabotaging criteria is underperformance and a lack of reflective practice. This is at the heart of doing things that are the opposite of what is desired as a teacher or administrator.
Signs that a teacher is underperforming:
- Hiding performance / resisting transparency measures
- Student performance is lower than standardised metrics or moderated results with other classes
- Attempting to deflect/criticise/identify/draw attention to other teachers that may also be underperforming
- A lack of self reflection / lack of evidence that underperformance is being addressed
- An inability/unwillingness to collaborate effectively with all members of the team
- Student/Parent complaints
- Requests for others to do their work or be paid extra for work that is part of their job description
- Unwillingness to contribute outside of 8.30 to 3.00
- Requirements for admin to regularly intercede due to conflict
- Lack of modification of identified undesirable behaviours
- actively seek to avoid classroom teaching
- personalising criticism rather than seeking to address an issue
- Fear and discipline is the main motivator to encourage learning
If someone is seeking promotion to HOLA, Student Services or Administration they need to have support that they have the ability to perform in that role and evidence that they have recently performed in that role. Staff don't often realise that when a leader is requested for a recommendation they cannot over inflate the negative and need to identify what they can do as well as any weaknesses. All staff have weaknesses that can be addressed over time. That notwithstanding, underperforming staff seeking promotion are typically unable to show the qualities that would make them competitive for promotion and have some of the following qualities:
Signs of self sabotaging:
- Alienating those whose support is required for promotion
- Creating factions seeking to undermine initiatives to improve student performance
- Promoting the good old days without promoting the changes that have been successful
- Being inflexible / cantankerous / obstinant / passive aggressive / passive defiant / avoidant
- inflated opinion of ability
- Not seeking or taking opportunities to display skills and attributes
- low self esteem (depression) / highly inflated self esteem (narcissism)
- are not clear about their career aspirations
- have not sought assistance with their application / have attracted few mentors
- Seeking to get their own way by "bullying", aggressive or emotional language
These behaviours need to be discouraged as they are not good for the health of the organisation, or the person exhibiting these behaviours as they will often be unaware of why they are not getting the recognition or promotion they believe they deserve.
Bullying is an important one. In today's society no-one should promote someone known for bullying. This is an absolute headache for admin as a bully will create work for those working around them for the sake of "efficiency" benefits that rarely exist or put people down to raise their own self esteem causing anxiety, low morale and turnover of staff.
Good leadership requires making it clear what desirable and undesirable behaviours are and providing a clear organisational vision. Management is required for compliance issues, where leading staff willingly fails and/or where corrective instruction is required. Leadership tends to focus on macro decisions regarding the pathway of a faculty (relying on professionalism to interpret correctly the direction given), "micro" management should be minimised to what is absolutely necessary to get a person to fulfil their responsibilities.
Unmanageable staff need to either be limited in scope (typically because they are highly functional in a subset of roles needed by an organisation) and/or be informed that their behaviours are unacceptable, informed as to why, the possible consequences of these behaviours and given a period of time to rectify their behaviour. It should be clear that Management is not bullying, but management should be underpinned by an evidence base, clear communication or an instruction from higher in management.