Mental Health (particularly depression and anxiety) is one of those things that cannot be written about or discussed freely in the staffroom. It adds a level of complexity to teaching children and a level of complexity to the role of a teacher. Being labelled with a mental health issue is not something that is easily moved on. It is an underground issue that can change how a child is perceived and limit the progression and career of a teacher.
2016 was the year of challenges for boys in education. The fear of leaving school was palpable with little in the way of career opportunities for boys, both in the mining sciences through tertiary study, through building and construction or through manufacturing industries. The path to a wage or salary position was unclear, as were pathways to white or blue collar work. Students saw parents in long term unemployment. The number of mental health raised issues rose in schools, as did neglect and behavioural issues in classes. The meaning of why students should seek education as a path to employment was blurred as increasingly specialised schooling did not provide the promise of first jobs and the value of a generalised education for the future was not being sold to students that knew better through observations of society and the freedom of information available. Everyone is an expert in the Facebook and Google age. The validity of information and truth itself became increasingly questionable and fake everything became the norm, fame the object rather than the result of success and narcissism the new black. Add to that students that have achieved D/Es in math for their entire schooling that are progressing at a high level but know that they are not at level though mandatory use of Australian Curriculum grading really did not help. Worryingly recreational drug use appeared to be rising again leading to further mental health issues.
2017 was the year where mental health in teaching staff reached the limit of what could be supported. The question was not who had mental health challenges, but who didn't, who was still able to cope regardless and who had to be nursed through until they could cope again. The demands of an education system with limited discipline support, where engagement was the only real answer, where curriculum was alienating large parts of the student cohort, where curriculum modification required teaching three to four years on either side of the curriculum set, where the teacher had to have the answers or be deemed incapable placed additional pressure on teaching and administrative staff. Tie this together with budget measures increasing class sizes, reducing access to behavioural programmes and diminishing external support (the loss of headspace and other programmes had an effect) was a bit of a tsunami in terms of stress in the classroom. Supporting and managing staff with emerging or with diagnosed mental health issues is often a thankless task.
The positive is that private and charitable organisations are starting to fill the need but it adds an additional level of management required on an already stressed administrative system. Where three to four people in a school now manage staffing, timetabling, behaviour, analysis, strategic planning, marketing, performance management, finance, community standing - it is not always clear how they can also focus on academic performance, course counseling and wellbeing of staff and students - leading to a feeling of a tokenistic approach at times. This was always going to be the challenge of de-centralisation and the independent school system - the same resources to achieve local agendas, a grand but difficult plan to implement.
Engagement of students is always the ultimate aim, in a world where schools drive the wellbeing of the local community, I'm not sure schools are sufficiently resourced, either with adequate trained manpower or financially to achieve societal aims. With the influx of career teachers and the diminishing number of vocational teachers (who are burning out trying to achieve what previously could be done with a little effort), next year could be a tough one both in dealing with the inevitable turnover that comes from time to time and some tough cohorts that are travelling through the system.