I spend considerable time each term dealing with streaming issues. The issues in each stream are significant and relate to the perceptions of how streams should work by stakeholders. Some of the issues faced below occur each term and relate to students wishing to move streams.
1. Stream sniping: A disengaging student in the bottom third of a class seeks access to a lower stream to find success and claims demotivation/anxiety as primary reason for lack of success. Where a large gap exists between streams, by allowing a high ability student into a lower ability class, it has the potential to demotivate current students finding success in the lower stream. The preferred solution is to use engagement strategies to again make the student competitive in the higher stream.
2. Teacher pedagogy: A student is struggling to adapt to teaching methods of a teacher compared to a teacher in a previous year. This is most evident when moving from an inexperienced teacher that teaches a narrow directed course to a more experienced teacher that drives a conceptual course in middle secondary years. Issues can also relate to over or under expectation of students, particularly late maturing boys or over emotional girls. The preferred solution is recognise the issue and to develop the capacity for independent learning whilst providing additional support for students struggling in transition.
3. Performance Anxiety: A student who has experienced significant failure over time may be unable to function optimally under assessment conditions. The preferred solution is to focus on what has been learned from each assessment and provide alternate assessment feedback to the student to indicate their learning.
4. Restreaming resistance: Teachers can provide significant resistance to restreaming students as it can cause considerable disruption to stable environments to continue to have students introduced to a class. Popular teachers able to cater with difficult students can often have classes swell in size if not observed carefully. Where restreaming has been successful, the temptation is to introduce more students that are also struggling to see if a similar result can be obtained. The solution here in most cases is to resist re-streaming outside of defined streaming times during the year in all but extreme cases and limit transition issues to defined periods during the year to maximise learning for all students in each class.
5. Parent nag: A student can nag their parent into continuous follow up with the school where no evidence exists that a student warrants moving. This can often follow when a student is allowed to move for legitimate reasons and friends or students with lower results see it as a path to lower work expectations. The solution for this is a clear understanding of the evidence base for the student (current ranking, standardised testing, prior grades) and re-presenting this nicely back to the parent. Often this is as simple as replying with their ranking and indicating that others would be considered first.
6. Disengagement: Where students disengage on mass, as issue exists for the teacher to re-engage the class. The solution requires examining pedagogy, engagement strategies, expectations, content and audience to identify strategies that may work. This can require questioning teaching philosophies and compromising principles to get students to a position where learning recommences.
7. Isolation: This is a hard one. Where a student is an isolate in a class and friendship groups are elsewhere, especially students with limited social skills, the requirement to move class can be legitimate. The performance of a student in this situation where a student is on their own or where a class has turned on them (girls in particular can be mean in this situation), moving the student can be required. This should be done in conjunction with student services to ensure that the teacher isn't then nagged by a wider range of students.
8. Transition: A student transitioning from a lower to a higher pathway needs time to transition as there will be considerable gaps in understanding, particularly closer to Year 10. Students in this situation need constant care and encouragement to find success. To promote success, students should be primed as to the expected behaviours of the new class and be preloaded with material prior to movement to support their success in the new class.
Streaming is not a simple solution to drive learning - it is a blunt instrument that is used at specific times of the year to ability group students. After it is done, time is needed to assess the requirements for the next streaming point - constant change will result in making it difficult to settle the streams and get them right - it is better to use differentiation between streaming points and make better streams than to use streams as diagnostic tools to provide students opportunities and disrupt the learning of many, constantly. Those involved with streaming know this intuitively, as they have to deal constantly with the demands of restreaming otherwise.