Today may be looked back as a turning point in education. Is this the disruption in education that has been predicted for some time? Can we take the predictable and repeatable process of educating students and automate the repetitive parts without significantly reducing outcomes and with lower costs? Can education be made more efficient than 1 teacher to 30 students with high capital outlays and investment in property?
Is this the day when the model for educating students changes?
If changes in the economy return us to a nuclear family structure with a maximum of one parent working with the other caring for children or unemployed could this lead to a change in the teaching model?
For instance, if a distance model becomes the norm for many students and parents take a significant role in education of children and teacher re-training occurs on a large scale, do we need schools open 5 days per week?
Imagine if things changed. A 60,000 teacher strong workforce instantly becomes the strongest 2000 delivering online and the rest part time if at all. Online everything becomes the norm.
This has never been able to be done as technology was not there..
It's an interesting thought.
Are teachers in a privileged position with salaries and doing a job that could be done by a relative few? Is there a legitimate case for laying off teachers to preserve capital for the upcoming recession/depression? Some are seeing this period as an extended holiday or a "work" at home. I'd suggest that everyone get into doing something productive such that we can say "I'm needed for my kids to make parents very happy that they have a great teacher" - otherwise these sorts of questions might be raised. There will be discontent over the have's and have not's.
Yesterday I presented to staff and posed the questions -
What is online learning and what does it look like?
What is the difference between supplementing learning online and delivering teaching online?
For some, there was no difference, for others this caused a critical change in thinking.
The flipped classroom was the first point where teaching was effectively done and supported offline in schools and is closest to an offline delivery model that we have for parents. Teachers "instruct" online, students complete work offline and self mark or submit work online, teachers are available to answer questions online as they occur. The intervention done by teachers observing work being completed is not done easily or neatly and would be an area managed by parents.
Teachers might be able to identify things to look out for to parents to increase intervention. Would this be enough to change education from a 60000 strong workforce "rolls royce" solution to a 2000 "it'll do" model where very similar results are found after 12 years of schooling (do the possible efficiency gains possible offline for students of high ability offset the need for 12 years of schooling and would it be less for those that would be diverted into other forms of education such as apprenticeships and the like).
To perform in society, do children need to attend in person school for 12 years?
Heresy.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi, thanks for leaving a comment.. it's good to hear what people think!