The need to stop and rethink

Sometimes after assessment you need time to stop and rethink. When a course of work has succeeded for a number of years and fails spectacularly with a particular group, it's a good thing to reflect on what has happened.

If a group of students can't follow instructions to complete a task the underlying issues should be examined.
a) Has your teaching changed(content/pedagogy)?
b) Are the students somewhat different to other groups and how(ESL/refugee/migrant visa/disaffected/gender specific/generational change/indigenous)?
c) Has the environment changed (bullying/timetable/family/schooling structure)?

This happened to me recently and I learned a lot from it. My final conclusion in this case was that the kids had changed - I had a weak group, caused by frequent absenteeism over many years and a raft of 'community' issues. These were kids lost in the system. I became a better teacher as I had to think of new ways to teach content that I had taught successfully a number of times before. In a heterogeneous class, I never would have had the time to backtrack, but in a streamed class destined for 1B in year 11, just this once I had the time these kids needed.

I had to diagnose the core issues, backtrack and reteach basics that are normally assumed to be in place since primary school. This in itself was a new experience as teaching solely upper school classes removes you from some of the resources and skills necessary for primary content.

I had to face issues similar to I imagine that of low literacy English classes, where finding age appropriate basic reading materials for adolescents can be difficult.

After they had learned the basic materials, I had to consider topic fatigue and put the desired year 10 learning aside for a time, giving them a break whilst they digested the new material. This gave me time to retest for retention, to make sure this time the learning 'stuck'. I had to be careful that the prerequisite material had actually been learned where previous teachers had been unsuccessful. For some, the motivation to retry a topic failed (where they had multiple failed attempts over multiple years). It was a lot to bear, difficult for them to face and hard to kick start. Kids are proud and rarely want to accept that they can't do something their peers can do readily. In a large class, it's easier to give up and hide in the sea of faces.

The turning point was when we finally revisited the topic and we looked back and could say, 'that was pretty easy now I know how'. Like with most things, unless the end point is well defined (the goal) it's impossible to see when something is achieved.

It's a real reason why wafty curriculum fails inexperienced teachers.

Belief in teaching

We have a building crisis in confidence in our teachers, a crisis coming about to deflect blame for poor government curriculum decisions and poor staff management procedures over an extended period of time.

It seems we are forever looking for magic bullets, where only hard work and dedication will bring about lasting results. It seems counter intuitive to expect hard work and dedication when your federal minister releases press on a regular basis about how improvement is needed - creates metrics to measure improvement but offers little in proven programmes that bring about that improvement.

I wonder how long it will take the penny to drop that the difference in student performance is rarely school performance but is actually the difference in parental support. This accounts for the difference across postcodes in a way that blaming schools does not. It's not parents fault either - their education level is what it is, generational change is the only thing that will eradicate the issue.

Until then, these kids need more time and instruction to succeed - yr 13, university bridging courses, after school tutoring, summer schools. To have effective courses we need a bunch of people that care about students, are motivated, skilled, nurtured and valued. These people have always been called teachers, lecturers, youth workers, aides, social workers, librarians and more recently chaplains. To continue to score political points against teachers is to shoot people that can make a difference.

Do the world a favour and encourage those making a difference. Chucking around money like confetti rarely brings this about. In fact it usually starts attracting vultures and those without community values that firmly have profits in their sights. The ABC Learning centres fiasco should have brought the effectiveness of profit driven public service firmly into the light.

We know our kids lack values, values previously imbued by parents and religious backgrounds and ethics. Today we need the people willing to set an example and do superhuman things with groups of kids that most people would fear talking to for 5 minutes, heaven forbid five to seven consecutive years.

Technology in the short to medium term can't fill this role. A new curriculum or statistical analysis will not fix the problem. Perhaps we should accept that social change is not the sole role of schooling and put the boot away for a while whilst the community pulls together and is assisted to do what is necessary in a practical, tried and accountable manner. Stop trying to make teachers and schools scapegoats.

Yes Ms Gillard, I mean you.

Updated 13/2/10: Here's another media release about a scheme to 'improve teacher quality' and improve 'teaching standards' (more than likely by those same teachers that require improvement) without details on how it will be done - but with wads of money attached to do whatever it?!? is.

Week 2, 2010 reflection

Had a great couple of weeks thus far: students are working well, keeping out of trouble. My aim this year is to increase the amount of learning that is going on in my classes.

To do this I aim to:

• increase the amount of direct instruction
• increase the amount of on-task time
• reduce the number of behaviour issues
• promote 'the search for an aha moment' as an enjoyable experience

Thus far things are going swimmingly. I started by randomly seating students, explaining to them that by increasing their circle of friends they were more likely know someone that could help them if they were stuck.

Then I set about increasing the expectation of performance, setting regular homework, giving time limits on completing tasks and setting a pace from the time they entered the room.

I paid special attention to student dynamics in the class, emphasising that performance was required to stay in the class. There is competition to get into this class as a precursor for 2A/2C/3A in upper school, so students need to perform well to remain.

I've talked to students a lot about the need to understand what it takes to learn, digging up my old "huh??!!, Doh!, OH!" model, emphasizing trying and practicing as a pathway to learning and long term retention of information.

I've also worked to modify my often unrealistic expectations and drive kids towards work where they can see real achievement. I've slowed my content delivery pace a lot (students are doing more work with a more limited focus), and it has shown a vast improvement in the general demeanor of this year's class.

I've looked at the class and tried to determine who will form the heart and motor of the room. These kids set the tone, mood and pace of the class. I'm more conscious of when they are behaving abnormally and investigate more quickly. The class picks up on this as an indication that I care about their well being as a whole.

I've set class goals which include rewards for outperforming the 'A' class and ever increasing goals for the class average, daily performance goals tied to the school reward scheme and try and give more incidental verbal acknowledgement of achievement.

I've surveyed the kids to determine their benchmark enjoyment of mathematics and then see how this changes over the year. I've recorded their friendship groups and attempted to identify any isolates.

It's vibrant and fun.

In school research

I started my studies for my masters this year and it's good to be doing something thought provoking again. There's a bit of a rush on post graduate studies at school at the moment, with many feeling more comfortable to start now that many NCOS subjects are bedded down. Lots by coursework, I think I am the only one doing it by thesis.

This term I'm looking at group dynamics and seeing how student/teacher interaction can be made more fruitful. Everyone that I explain my topic to seems to think I'm trying to do groupwork with my students (and I get a lecture on the validity of groupwork and assessment). These discussions have helped crystallise my resolve to assist students use their classtime more fruitfully and have students engage in meaningful conversation with a wider range of students. It's not really about collaboration and groupwork in the "put four people in a group and watch one do the work" mould.

It goes back to the 60 minute period - ~20 minutes instruction (10+ 10 or 7 + 7 + 7) and 40 minutes intervention time. In a class of 20, if all students are relying on the teacher for help, that's two minutes per student and a lot of time wasted waiting for the teacher, in a class of 30 it's worse.

A few minor issues have arisen that has forced me to widen the scope of my project. The first being that I need benchmark information at the start of the year but classes are fluid until week 4 when streams are set in stone. The second being the raft of hurdles that need to be jumped before research can begin.

The hurdles thus far:
Acceptance by university into the Masters course (a discussion, two phone calls and an email).
My WACOT registration expired whilst the transition from registered teacher occurred (and was an absolutely painful process to resolve with the same document lost multiple times by WACOT).
My WWC expired during the break (and required signing by the principal before a new one could be applied for and something that the screening unit needs to consider)
Approval by the university that the topic would comprise valid research (relatively painless as was done as part of a summer school unit)
Human Research Ethics Committee approval from the university (relatively painless as was done as part of a summer school unit)
Approval to proceed by the department (this was the big surprise - Policy and Planning at DET are a well oiled machine and made this a really pleasant experience with a fantastic turnaround)
Approval by my site manager (our principal).

Still to go:
Approval by parents
Approval by students
Approval by staff

The good thing is that now I have passed all of the third party stakeholders, I only need approvals directly related to the participants.